E-Book Details
Why Organizational Climate Surveys May Do More Harm Than
Good
(Executive Summary in At Work Newsletter—in the “Performance
At Work”Column)
Several divisions in both DuPont and Clorox commissioned
annual climate surveys to give them guidance as leaders to improving
the organization. Once they evaluated the effects they were
producing with the survey, however they found far more effective
means of achieving their intentions and getting more ‘bang
for the buck’. In fact, one DuPont Senior Vice President
ruefully acknowledges, “we have learned, the hard way,
that climate surveys are not neutral means of getting information.
They actually may have created more harm than good in some
cases, and for reasons we did not understand. We better achieve
our intentions through ‘deliberative group processes’;
and in that way avoid the unintended consequences of surveys
and similar instruments.”
A manager who is accountable for the “culture change
process” in one DuPont sector explains why the concern
developed regarding surveys. “What we are trying to develop
are self-reliant individuals, who apply good judgment on behalf
of the organization, who wisely apply resources and capabilities
to improving the effectiveness of stakeholder such as customer’s,
and who initiate and sustain effort to make the organization
work to produce results. We want this to happen within the
context of a business strategy and while considering the ever-changing
dynamics in the marketplace. But if that is what you want,
you have to question whether every action you take is moving
you in that direction or away from it. Along with many other
typical organizational initiatives, we found that climate surveys
and other similar surveys were not supportive.” 36
pgs
|
|
36 pgs
Instant PDF
download
Free Acrobat Reader at Adobe.com |
< All E-Books | Order
Form >